This is an old revision of the document!


Rule 2: Mark sensitive content with a content warning.

  • If the topic or content of your post is likely to put a burden on someone else, use the Content Warning feature to give other people a chance to decide whether or not they want to see it.
  • Don't be a jerk.

This is a judgment call.

If you polled 100 people at random - either from Infosec.Exchange or from society in general - how many of them would say “ugh I did not need to see that”? If you suspect the answer is “more than a few” then most likely your post belongs behind a Content Warning. Hey, maybe you don't even need to post it.

Content Warning is designed to give people a chance to avoid content they do not wish to see.

Use of a Content Warning in no way provides a magical bypass of other Infosec.Exchange rules and/or basic human decency.

A non-exhaustive list of topics where people may be grateful for a Content Warning:

  • Violence
  • Hatred
  • Sexual content
  • Gore
  • Anything which reasonable people agree is NSFW/NSFL
  • Politics
  • Religion
  • Extemporaneous thoughts of billionaire manchildren

I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it.US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964)